A special option to develop SwiftPM Packages inside Xcode initiatives — Erica Sadun


WWDC gave us many causes to each migrate libraries to SwiftPM and to develop new ones to assist our work. The combination between Xcode improvement and SwiftPM dependencies retains rising stronger and extra vital.

Apple’s Modifying a Bundle Dependency as a Native Bundle assumes you’ll drag in your package deal to an Xcode undertaking as a neighborhood package deal overrides one which’s imported by a traditional package deal dependency.

In Creating a Swift Bundle in Tandem with an App, Apple writes, “To develop a Swift package deal in tandem with an app, you may leverage the habits whereby a neighborhood package deal overrides a package deal dependency with the identical title…for those who launch a brand new model of your Swift package deal or need to cease utilizing the native package deal, take away it from the undertaking to make use of the package deal dependency once more.”

I don’t use this strategy. It’s not unhealthy or improper, it simply doesn’t match my fashion.

However, opening the Bundle.swift file on to develop has drawbacks in that it doesn’t absolutely provide Xcode’s suite of IDE assist options but.

So I’ve been engaged on a private resolution that greatest works for me. I need my package deal improvement and its assessments to stay individually from any particular consumer app exterior a testbed. I would like to make sure that my code will swift construct and swift check correctly however I additionally need to use Xcode’s built-in compilation and unit testing with my pleased inexperienced checks.

I set out to determine how greatest, no less than for me, to develop Swift packages beneath the xcodeproj umbrella.

I first explored  swift package deal generate-xcodeproj. This builds an Xcode library undertaking full with assessments and a package deal goal. You need to use the --type flag to set the package deal to executable, system-module, or manifest as a substitute of the default (library) throughout swift package deal init:

Generate% swift package deal init
Creating library package deal: Generate
Creating Bundle.swift
Creating README.md
Creating .gitignore
Creating Sources/
Creating Sources/Generate/Generate.swift
Creating Assessments/
Creating Assessments/LinuxMain.swift
Creating Assessments/GenerateTests/
Creating Assessments/GenerateTests/GenerateTests.swift
Creating Assessments/GenerateTests/XCTestManifests.swift
Generate% swift package deal generate-xcodeproj
generated: ./Generate.xcodeproj

Though SwiftPM creates a .gitignore file for you as you see, it doesn’t initialize a git repository. Additionally, I all the time find yourself deleting the .gitignore as I take advantage of a custom-made world ignore file. That is what the ensuing undertaking appears like:

As you see, the generated Xcode undertaking has every thing however a testbed for you. I actually like having an on-hand testbed, whether or not a easy SwiftUI app or a command line utility to play with concepts. I appeared into utilizing a playground however let’s face it: too gradual, too glitchy, too unreliable.

It’s a ache so as to add a testbed to this set-up, so I got here up with a special option to construct my base package deal atmosphere. It’s hacky however I a lot desire the end result. As an alternative of producing the undertaking, I begin with a testbed undertaking after which create my package deal. This strategy naturally packs a pattern with the package deal however none of that pattern leaks into the package deal itself:

I find yourself with three targets: the pattern app, a library constructed from my Sources, and my assessments. The library folder you see right here accommodates solely an Data.plist and a bridging header. It in any other case builds from no matter Sources I’ve added.

I a lot desire this set-up to the generate-xcodeproj strategy, though it takes barely longer to set-up. The rationale for that is that SwiftPM and Xcode use totally different philosophies for a way a undertaking folder is structured. SwiftPM has its Sources and Assessments. Xcode makes use of a supply folder named after the undertaking.

So I take away that folder, add a Sources group to the undertaking, and be certain that my construct phases sees and compiles these recordsdata. The Assessments want comparable tweaks, plus I’ve so as to add a symbolic hyperlink from Xcode’s assessments title (e.g. “ProjectNameAssessments”) to my SwiftPM Assessments folder on the high degree of my undertaking to get it to all hold collectively. As soon as I’ve completed so my inexperienced checks are prepared and ready simply as if I had opened the Bundle.swift file straight. However this time, I’ve all the appropriate instruments at hand.

Since I’m speaking about set-up, let me add that my duties additionally embrace organising the README, including a license and creating the preliminary change log. These are SwiftPM setup duties that swift package deal init doesn’t cowl the way in which I like. I trash .gitignore however since I’ve Xcode set-up to routinely initialize model management, I don’t need to git init by hand.

I think it is a short-term workaround as I count on the combination of SwiftPM and Xcode to proceed rising over the following couple of years. Since WWDC, I’ve been notably enthusiastic about growing, deploying, and integrating SwiftPM packages. I believed I’d share this in case it would assist others. Let me know.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles